A weekĀ ago I wrote about a commentĀ posted by Markus āNotchā Persson on Reddit, which pertainedĀ to video games and the common request from gamers and press alike that theyĀ wantĀ to see more femaleĀ protagonistsĀ introduced into the medium.
Notchās comments were posted in response to a Redditor asking for the Minecraft developerās thoughts on ājournalists and gamers who criticize gaming companies for not including playable female characters such as GTA V, Link, and Assassinās Creed,ā adding: āDo you feel like it would be a cool artistic direction, or do you feel like itās a non issue?ā Notch replied: āItās an obvious non-issue, and people who claim this trend isnāt censorship are two faced liars,ā but continued: āThere are things I agree with, however. Say youāre writing the rules for a game and you donāt know the gender of the player. Donāt assume male, thatās just weird. Some use he/she, but I personally am a huge fan of ātheyā.ā
A few days later Notch called me out for the piece on Twitter, saying that I had misrepresented his views. InitiallyĀ believing that I had pieced together quotes from his Twitter to infer that he was sexist, I responded to this criticism by pointing out that I hadnāt made such a claim, but had instead offered my own opinion that I fundamentally disagreed with his thoughts on what does/does not constitute censorship in video games. He said that I had ācherry picked quotes from Twitter,ā when in actuality I had posted his comments from Reddit verbatim, including my own opinion at the bottom of the article that ā again ā did not in any way state he was sexist, but rather that I disagreed with his opinion that requesting the introduction of female protagonists into established video game seriesĀ is censorship.
As you can imagine would be the case after being called out by a high-profile industry figure with 3.79 million Twitter followers, I was promptly inundated with hundreds of tweets opposing my views or, in many cases, opposing what these individuals thought were my views despiteĀ clearly not having read my article. Though this series of events wasĀ distinctly not fun, it was well within Notchās rights to criticize my article on a public forum, regardless of the size of his following compared to mine, even if I would have preferred it had he not just āskimmedā the pieceĀ before implying that I was āfucking scum.ā He may still believe that Iām fucking scum after reading it, though, so I guess allās fair in love and war (coincidentally, early last year I wrote a piece onĀ Notch calling out an indie developer who had criticized him, expressing how just because the guy has a large online following that shouldnāt therefore mean he isnāt allowed to publicly defend himself or express his opinion.)
The main point that was raised by both Notch and his followers was that he didnāt believe that there should be no female protagonists in video games, which I am well aware of and I outlined in my previousĀ article. He/they said that he instead believes that gamers and press criticizing developers for not including female characters is akin to censorship, as it forces developers toĀ make decisions against their own will for fear of facing a backlash or more criticism. Again, I am aware of this, and this is the exact opinion that I opposed in my article, but given the immense backlash that I and it have now received, I feel itās worth expressing the reasoning behind my disapproval in moreĀ detail.
Ā
The āCry Babyā Conundrum
If developers feel strong-armed into making decisions that would not benefit their games in favor of appeasing critics, then Iād suggest that the onus of blame is upon them for not feeling confident enough in theirĀ gameĀ to allow it to face criticism. It was veryĀ ironic thatĀ so many tweeting at me suggested that developers shouldnāt introduce female characters to appeaseĀ ācry babiesā whose āfeelings had been hurt,āĀ while simultaneously suggesting that the press/consumers shouldnāt criticize developers in case we hurt their feelings too much.
The prevailing opinion in the tweetsĀ I received was thatĀ criticizing a developerās choice to not include a female playable character was basically the same as calling them a misogynist, which is also firmly NOT the case.Ā If a developer opts to place a male protagonist in their game, thereās no reason why it shouldnāt be acceptable for press and consumers alike to ask them why they made that decision, and how it contributes to their story in aĀ manner which a female protagonist wouldnāt have. Weāve seen this happen with the likes of the Grand Theft Auto V and Final Fantasy XV, with both Rockstar and Square EnixĀ responding to queries regardingĀ their firmlyĀ male cast by stating that doing so was essential to the story they were trying to tell. This is how developers should respond to this debate, if they are confident enough in their own creative choices.Ā
Which brings us neatly to The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. The mounting requests for Nintendo to include a female version of Link in the upcoming Wii U/NX game were eventually confronted by Nintendo, with the gameās producerĀ Eiji Aonuma telling Kotaku: āYou know thereās the idea of the Triforce in the Zelda games we make. The Triforce is made up of Princess Zelda, Ganon and Link. Princess Zelda is obviously female. If we made Link a female we thought that would mess with the balance of the Triforce. Thatās why we decided not to do it.ā
This explanation was met with criticism, largely because it doesnāt make any sense whatsoever. As pointed out by our sister site GameRevolution, itās a lot like Ubisoft saying that they opted for 30 frames per second in their games because it is a āmore cinematicā frame rate than 60 frames per second; this was an incredibly questionable suggestion, and we all calledĀ promptly called them out for it.
In my mind, there is no difference between the reaction to Ubisoftās claimĀ that employing aĀ lesserĀ frame rate made their games more ācinematic,ā and Nintendoās claim that retaining a male Link was to keep the āTriforce balancedā (even though a Triforce has, as its name suggests, three sides, so therefore no matter how many male and female characters it is made up of, by itās very nature it will always be unbalanced). The only difference is that people are much more likely to become irate when criticismsĀ of a game are rooted in social politics because, as weāve all learned in recent years, many continue to believe that games should exist in a vacuum and remainĀ the only entertainmentĀ industryĀ that refuses to acknowledge the world aroundĀ it.Ā
Ā
āGirls Donāt Sell Gamesā
Notch later told me that he believes that āswitching the roles of Link and Zelda would be a breath of fresh air in the series,ā but that ājust making Link female to placate crybabies does nothing to a game that doesnāt explore gender roles.ā I can partially agree with this viewpoint, in that Iād rather see a game that places Zelda as the protagonist rather than play as a gender-swapped Link, largely because Link is a uniformly dull character that has always been a blank canvas of personality aside from his iconic green tunic. What I do disagree with, however, is the assumption that those strongly advocating for established video game series to introduce female protagonists are wrong for doing so, and that those requesting such changes are guilty of attempting to censor creators.
The video game industry has openly admitted that it has issues with introducing female protagonists into games.Ā Back in 2013, Dontnod Entertainment revealed how they had came up against multiple stumbling blocks when trying to seek funding for their game Remember Me. Creative director Jean Max-Morris admitted that this funding was a result of the gameās protagonist, saying:Ā āWe had some [publishers] that said, āWell, we donāt want to publish it because thatās not going to succeed. You canāt have a female character in games. It has to be a male character, simple as that.'ā
This myopic view has been prevalent in video games for as long as the industry has existed, with it being a long-held belief that female protagonists donāt sell games, despite these publishers simultaneously refusing to funnel funding into marketing them. Female-led games such as Beyond Good & Evil, which is now hailed as one of the entire industryās most under-appreciated games ever, was released with a minuscule marketing budget into one of the most jam-packed years for games in the past two decades, with its lack of financial success being held up by many as an example of why publishers are correct in thinking that, if they wish to make money, they should stick to the male heroes.
Only recently has it started to become apparent that this is not the case, with publishers now taking a āriskā on introducing more female lead characters into their games and then heavily promoting said games, with the likes of the upcoming Horizon: Zero Dawn and Mass Effect: Andromeda being two of the most anticipated new games of the near future, and with both of them featuring female protagonists. But this change hasnāt been coincidental; publishers would not be willing to make the decision to introduce these female characters if it were not for both press and consumers asking for them.
If there continued to be silence when Space Marine Man #492 was pitched as the hero of the next big game, then rest assured that publishers would still continue to not represent a large portion of their audience, and that female protagonists would continue to be overlooked. The continued rise in a more diverse range of protagonists in gaming is a direct result of people questioning the status quo, and so this suggestionĀ that anything other than complete, undivided acceptance of publishersĀ and developers routinely deciding against female characters is therefore censorship is thoroughly misguided.
On a personal note, I want more female video game protagonistsĀ to exist, because I think greater representation of a more diverse range of people makes for more interesting games. I therefore recognize that the only way both publishers and developers alike will be willing to take the plunge in this regard is if we ask for them, because if we donāt, then as evidenced by decades of male protagonists being the default option in the industry, they wonāt bother.Ā If a developer feels threatened byĀ opting for a male character to be placed at the forefront of their game, then they should consider why they feel threatened. If they conclude that it is because there is no discernible reason for them having made such a decision, then they should be willing to accept the criticisms of their choice.Ā