Interview | Andrew Stanton & Lindsey Collins Explain Why ‘Finding Dory’ Was Necessary

Sequels are a way of life in Hollywood, where any successful film can lead to a follow-up, even if continuing the story makes absolutely no sense. But that’s not the case for Finding Dory, a sequel that no one can say was rushed into production, and exists for a very specific reason. Nearly a decade after the release of Finding Nemo, director Andrew Stanton and producer Lindsey Collins realized that Dory – the blue tang with short-term memory loss who helps a clownfish named Marlin rescue his son – never got a proper “thank you.”

In fact, there were a lot of things about Dory that remained unresolved until Finding Dory, and Andrew Stanton and Lindsey Collins were more than happy to talk about the gaps in the narrative that their new movie strives to fill. In the following interview, I sat the filmmakers down to discuss why Finding Dory was actually important to produce, why the film feels so very different from Finding Nemo (even though they have very similar plots) and how one of the film’s most powerful themes – overcoming and owning what others might perceive as disabilities – came about almost by accident.

Disney / Pixar

Crave: I want to start here. Obviously it’s been a while since Finding Nemo

Andrew Stanton: Yeah.

Why was Finding Dory “necessary” for you?

Andrew Stanton: Well, I wouldn’t have guessed this ahead of time but it wasn’t until I watched it [again] that I realized she’s unresolved, from the writer’s standpoint. I’m like, she still carries a misconstrued point of view about herself. We love her at the end of Finding Nemo and everybody’s grateful for her, but she hasn’t been gifted with how everybody else sees her. So I felt like that, on an internal level, was very dissatisfying for me. And also just from a plotting standpoint I was like, I really did want to know… not where she was from, but that she would be gifted with knowing where she was from.

Was this a complaint that you had heard from other people over the years?

Andrew Stanton: No.

Lindsey Collins: No, no…

So you could have just not brought it up and gotten away with it.

Lindsey Collins: Yes, if he had kept it all to himself!

Andrew Stanton: Yeah, and I couldn’t drop it! I recognized as a writer that there was more meaty, juicy material – of contradiction and conflict – under the hood of her, still, than there are in some main characters that I’ve been striving for years to make work in other films. So I thought this is just really good material.

Disney / Pixar

Did you have any idea where she came from when you did the original?

Andrew Stanton: Nope.

Lindsey Collins: No.

Did you try? I’m curious why that didn’t come up…

Andrew Stanton: Why it didn’t come up?

Yeah, as a writer. 

Andrew Stanton: The story never asked for it so I didn’t have to.

Lindsey Collins: But you knew… What he did know, as was funny because it actually didn’t come up for a while on this film, was that she was wandering the ocean for a very long time by herself before she met Marlin.

Andrew Stanton: Yeah.

Lindsey Collins: So you knew that, as a writer. Like you were like, “Oh, I’m pretty sure she was alone before she met Marlin.”

Andrew Stanton: I knew she had this imbalanced sense of abandonment, that she and probably wandered the ocean and people had ditched her because she was probably annoying with her short-term memory loss, that she had probably strayed away from people that she had attached to, and that that’s what made her so optimistic and such a caregiver and so friendly, is it was protection. Maybe she’s tipping the insurance that, if I’m that helpful to you, maybe you won’t ditch me. So I think that’s why everybody didn’t think it was out of the blue when 50 minutes later in the film of Finding Nemo, she starts crying and saying “don’t leave me” when we’ve laid no track for it. And yet you accept it. I think it’s because you unconsciously know it can’t be good. This can’t be good that you’re alone in the ocean with this disease.

Disney / Pixar

One of the key differences between Finding Nemo and Finding Dory… they’re both kind of quest movies about reconnecting with family, but there’s an immediacy to the threat, to the separation in Finding Nemo.

Andrew Stanton: Yes. That’s very different in that one, yeah.

Finding Dory is obviously emotional, but…

Andrew Stanton: It’s more introspective.

Yeah, how do you deal with that? I feel like there’s a level of intensity that’s very different.

Andrew Stanton: Yeah, and you just have recognize that. And then part of the four-year journey is not only recognizing it but learning how to approach it, so that you find tension by some other means, you know? And you don’t have the luxury… it’s actually a luxury to have something as blatant and as obvious as “somebody kidnapped my child and I’ve got to get him back.” Not every movie… most movies don’t have that luxury, you know? That’s why a lot of people like to make westerns because it’s so barebones and it’s one level above survival. Like, “If I lose my store or the farm we all die.” So it’s so immediate, you gain tension right away. But when you have more complicated movies that have layers and they’re not as much… it’s always, that’s part of the struggle. That’s part of the reason you get into storytelling, or story writing, is you’re just trying to find where the tension comes from.

One thing I noticed that I thought was interesting was, even though Marlin and Dory are in some respects parents to Nemo now, you never go for the romantic subplot.

Andrew Stanton: No! And that’s why I liked it in the beginning, in the first movie, when Ellen suddenly inspired me to do short-term memory loss via the way she deconstructed things, it made me go, “Wait a minute, why can’t this guide fish be female?” It doesn’t have the follow the stereotypical trope of, just because they’re opposite genders there should be romance. I loved breaking that rule, so…

Was there ever a temptation?

Andrew Stanton: No.

Lindsey Collins: No.

Andrew Stanton: No, I thought that was cliché and too easy.

Disney / Pixar

There’s this campaign – and I know it’s a separate issue – to “give Elsa a girlfriend.” I wonder why she needs a romantic plot to begin with. Why do we feel the need to shoehorn romance everywhere? I feel like we almost have too many of them in movies.

Lindsey Collins: [Laughs.] Yeah!

Andrew Stanton: I think it’s just easy. It’s just easy thinking.

Lindsey Collins: It’s an easy understanding of a relationship dynamic, and I think that’s part of the other thing that felt unresolved in the first one, is that… One of my favorite scenes in this film [Finding Dory] is the scene where Marlin actually thanks her.

Andrew Stanton: Yeah.

Lindsey Collins: Because it does feel like on the first film, yeah he does a quick thank you, but it’s in the middle of a tragedy and he’s….

Andrew Stanton: He’s not really in the right state of mind.

Lindsey Collins: …he’s not really in his right state of mind, so to have that also get kind of given to her as a, “You’ve changed my life. You make me do things that I would never have done before,” that’s a huge gift to her. And that scene was one of the first scenes we animated because it was such a strong… everybody knew that that scene needed to be in there because somehow that was another hole that we kind of left from the first film. It just didn’t feel right to stop and thank Dory in that film, but in this film it was like, no, she deserves that moment.

You’ve talked about how this new film fills in the gaps that were left from the first one. What gaps are in here for Finding Marlin…?

Andrew Stanton: I know. Well actually, we’ve had most people petition for Finding Hank, simply because he’s missing a tentacle. People want to know where that’s coming from.

It’s like Luke’s lightsaber.

Lindsey Collins: That’s exactly right. I made that same analogy.

Andrew Stanton: You did! To her credit.

Lindsey Collins: [Laughs.] To my dork credit I did make that same analogy yesterday.

Andrew Stanton: Her joke always is, if they suggest a Finding Hank they’re going to have to do Finding Andrew.

Lindsey Collins: Yeah, the prequel will have to be Finding Andrew because…

Andrew Stanton: I spent eight years with fish now. That’s a quarter of my life.

Disney / Pixar

Are you done with fish?

Andrew Stanton: I am, yeah. Yeah, so…

I am curious though. Do you feel like there’s anything unresolved on Finding Dory?

Andrew Stanton: Oh, you could make a story about anything it’s just whether or not it’s that good or that… that…

Lindsey Collins: Compelling?

Andrew Stanton: …compelling to spend four years of your life on it. [Laughs.] Seriously, it’s like that with any of the films, whether they’re sequels or originals. Do you want to spend four years with this haunting you, not working?

What do you want to spend the next four years of your life on?

Andrew Stanton: I don’t want to spend four years on anything anymore. I’m too old. I want to spend like two years or one…

YouTube clips…

Andrew Stanton: Yeah.

Lindsey Collins: Small movies.

That’s the thing, your movies are all huge. You went off and did John Carter, which I thought was really fun, but even that was a huge, epic production…

Andrew Stanton: I know…

What’s small? What can you do that…?

Andrew Stanton: Well, there’s a lot of small it’s just whether or not people are willing to pay money to let you make something small these days, you know? A lot of that ends up on TV now, so who knows?

Disney / Pixar

Has there been a temptation to continue Finding Nemo in that medium?

Andrew Stanton: Not that I’ve heard of. Unless you’ve heard something…

I have not heard something.

Andrew Stanton: Oh, okay.

From a technical perspective you’re making a sequel thirteen years later, and technology has evolved by leaps and bounds…

Andrew Stanton: Yeah.

But you’re stuck with the original character models…

Andrew Stanton: We had this funny… we never brought this up, but we had this funny thing where there were no iPhones when we made Finding Nemo, and so even though we’re saying in the movie it’s one year later, our temptation was to give people iPhones in the film. But we realized, “Oh, we can’t!”

Lindsey Collins: Because they wouldn’t have iPhones.

Andrew Stanton: It wouldn’t really work, so we just kind of avoided the whole technological advancements.

Lindsey Collins: Yeah, I think that… I mean look, we always have to do re-do our characters. There’s no mythical digital backlot, unfortunately, in our vault.

Andrew Stanton: No…

Lindsey Collins: So we always have to rebuild them, but the interesting thing [is] we had a perfect test. That scene where you actually replay the scene from Nemo where they meet for the first time was our test, to kind of go like, okay, this is a scene that everybody knows. It’s a set piece that everybody knows, that’s in the first film. So let’s see, what are our kind of parameters to improve upon the look of this film and make it feel like we have evolved and do all the things we want to do, but still feel like it’s the movie and the characters that everybody remembers that’s in that same world. So we kind of took that as a good looks test, where we improved enough of it that nobody hopefully notices, but it feels like it’s sitting in the right world.

There’s something I don’t know about fish. I was watching the movie and I was like, “Wait a minute, how long does it take for clownfish to become adults?”

Andrew Stanton: Uh…

Lindsey Collins: I don’t know.

Andrew Stanton: Probably days, knowing our luck! [Laughs.]

Lindsey Collins: Yeah, exactly.

Nemo’s kind of small still.

Andrew Stanton: I know. This is where you just kind of go more with instinct of like the human analogy, because that’s what people’s…

Lindsey Collins: Time has to [pass]…

Andrew Stanton: Yeah. We’re saying he’s only a year older but he’s probably ten years wiser because of what he’s been through.

Disney / Pixar

At what point did you realize – or was this always the intention – that this film is very much about people with disabilities? There are so many characters throughout the film…

Andrew Stanton: Yeah, it’s funny, I never consciously thought that. I thought… I did short-term memory loss because it was funny in the first one, so I had to deal with it, and I inherited that for this film. And then I wanted to deal with the fact that everybody has something that’s a flaw with themselves, or everybody has a point of view about something about themselves that they think is a flaw but it turns out that’s just what makes you unique and you need to just accept it. You don’t have to go be as extreme as having an obvious handicap to do that. That counts, but there’s also just personality, ways you think, ways you look at the world that make you, set you apart, that maybe you’re teachers didn’t get or your relatives didn’t get. So I feel like I was trying to speak to the universal of it. But portraying something in a general term never comes across well in the film. You want to hit with specificity. So you dealt with what logically exists out there with fish and problems they might have.

Has it surprised you on other films, where people would come at you and say you were obviously getting at this, and then…?

Andrew Stanton: Well, I don’t think that they’re wrong. They may be wrong that they think I had an agenda. Like, everything I do is in service to just the narrative emotions of the story and the universal truth I’m trying to make. And I may use specifics. Not everybody’s a fish but somehow they all get this. So I’m sure like, not everybody’s handicapped and hopefully they’ll all get this.

Lindsey Collins: I think that, I mean I’ve said this before because I think it’s true about your films in general, is that you come at it from a character standpoint and at a certain point the character is telling you – based on what you’ve written and who you’ve come up with – who they are and what they’re going to do in the world. Right? Whether that’s very small or whether that’s big. And I think that as much as it was not your intention, it’s not any surprise to me – and I don’t think to you – that Dory as a character is a poster child for people who are struggling with disabilities. I mean…

Andrew Stanton: I’m honored! It’s wonderful. I wish I could take credit and say that was my intention, but it wasn’t.

You could have though. This was the moment.

Andrew Stanton: Well, it’s the same in WALL-E. “You must be making an environmental statement.” Well, great if I am. I wasn’t conscious of it. I was just going with what felt truthful to me.

Lindsey Collins: But I think Dory is somebody who doesn’t… I mean honestly, and I know it’s weird to talk about Dory as if she’s a real person, but it’s like look, the fact of the matter is she never talks about Nemo’s little fin. She never talks about Destiny’s near-sightedness. “You swim beautifully.” She is that filled with grace…

Andrew Stanton: She’s accepting.

Lindsey Collins: …when it comes to everybody else, which is what I think people really love about her, why she resonates with everybody. And I think the fact that she then, her journey is to find that same grace for herself, or with herself, is the story you wrote and the fact is that actually speaks to, I think, people who are struggling. You know?

 


William Bibbiani (everyone calls him ‘Bibbs’) is Crave’s film content editor and critic. You can hear him every week on The B-Movies Podcast and Canceled Too Soon, and watch him on the weekly YouTube series Most Craved, Rapid Reviews and What the Flick. Follow his rantings on Twitter at @WilliamBibbiani.

 

The 50 Best Disney Movies Ever Made:

Photo: Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images for Disney

TRENDING


X