Justin LaBar, Josh Isenberg and Samantha Daley look at the Dean Ambrose vs Seth Rollins Hell in a Cell match and Nikki Bella vs Brie Bella.
In the battle of the twins, LaBar makes an argument of why this match could be better than many are expecting. He looks at their comfort with each other in the ring, the low expectations from fans and their in-ring work being far better than their acting on the mic with each other.
Isenberg debates LaBar’s points and then Daley jumps in with a very quick conclusion of what she will be doing during that match.
The conversation then shifts to Rollins and Ambrose. The argument is centered around who SHOULD win but who WILL win. Isenberg and LaBar disagree on the should and will factors and make their cases.
Watch and comment on who you agree with.
This video is 7:39 in length and presented by TagMeADate.com
DETAILS—HAVE DINNER & BE PART OF A PRIVATE Q&A WITH VINCE RUSSO IN PITTSBURGH
LIKE CHAIR SHOT REALITY ON FACEBOOK
FOLLOW CHAIR SHOT REALITY ON TWITTER