Bret Lockett Was Confused
“I’ve said before that it was a physical relationship, but I say that meaning there was a physical aspect in the relationship,” he said. “She did tell me that she was touching herself in a physical way over the phone, towards me. So when I say physical, that’s what I mean.” InTouch Weekly broke the story in a recent article in which Lockett claimed that he and Kardashian were sexually involved. If Lockett is lying, he went to great lengths to ensure he got his facts straight, even providing an alibi as to why he and Kardashian never met in person. “It was during my football season,” he said. “She was opening her stores in Miami and New York. I know her book signing was being launched at the time, so we weren’t able to connect.” Since Lockett first told InTouch Weekly about the relationship, Kardashian has been quick and stern about denying any contact with the football safety, even demanding the publication kill the story and threatening to sue Lockett for false claims. “I do not plan on apologizing or retracting anything,” he said to CNN. “What I’ve said is the complete, honest truth and you can’t fault someone for telling the truth. That’s just plain and simple.”
My heavens, Kim must be terrified of this shit leaking, especially because it can’t possibly be anything we’ve ever seen before. No, it really can’t. Everything we’ve seen before has been orchestrated, airbrushed, and contractually sound. If anyone sees Kim Kardashian’s tits without Ryan Seacrest signing off on it, chances are she’s going to disappear into a black hole. At least she’d be coming full circle.