Trolling #45: The Matrix Sequels RULE!

Welcome, my dear readers, to CraveOnline‘s Trolling, the series devoted to the contrarian in all of us. We gather to dismantle the vaunted, and praise the loathed. This week, we shall be looking at a curious phenomenon in sci-fi history, the 2003 release of the two sequels to The Matrix.

When The Matrix hit theaters in 1999, it unexpectedly rattled genre cinema out of its complacency, instantly creating a massive swarm of loyal cultists. The film wasn’t expected to be the enormous hit that it was, and writer/directors Andy and Larry Wachowski quickly became household names. It wasn’t long before the newly formed gaggle of fans started demanding a sequel, and the Wachowskis were equal to the task. They revealed plans to make what was essentially a single giant mega-sequel to The Matrix, to be released as two movies, both over the course of 2003.

Check Out: Trolling: The Big Lebowski SUCKS!



When The Matrix Reloaded was released on 15th May, fans initially seems pleased. They praised the film’s action, and were happy to have their favorite characters back in action again, fighting an evil computer intelligence that had imprisoned humanity within a computer simulation. And the cliffhanger ending only whetted appetites for more. When The Matrix Revolutions was released on 5th November, fans flocked to see it, but it seemed as if the bloom was off the rose. Reaction was not as passionate, and critics response had taken a severe dive (Reloaded scales at 73% on Rotten Tomatoes, while Revolutions came in at a paltry 36%. Since then, fans have turned their backs on the movies, rejecting them openly as overblown and terrible follow-ups. These days, it takes a brave soul to step forward and defend the Matrix sequels.

Which is what we’re here to do, gentle readers. Here at Trolling, we stand in front of the encroaching tanks, blocking them from steamrolling over the unpopular. Strap in and do some reconsideration, my friends. Because the Matrix sequels do not suck. Indeed, the Matrix sequels RULE! Let’s run down why this is true.  



Are the films too long? Yes they are. Are the convoluted? Absolutely. Indeed, the Matrix sequels are so complex and bizarre, you may find yourself lost in the forest of bonkers ideas and bizarre new notions (the orgasm-by-digital-cake sequence would be out-of-place in any movie). But all of the top-heavy, overblown stuff in the Matrix sequels seems to have a function, a purpose, and are certainly part of a larger tapestry of large-scale storytelling. They are fine, fine movies.

Until next week, let the hate mail flow.  


Witney Seibold is the head film critic for Nerdist, and a contributor on the CraveOnline Film Channel, and co-host of The B-Movies Podcast. You can read his weekly Trolling articles here on Crave, and follow him on “Twitter” at @WitneySeibold, where he is slowly losing his mind. 

TRENDING


X